A Constructive Approach to Independent and Evidence Retaining Belief Revision by General Information Sets
نویسندگان
چکیده
Recent years have seen a lot of work towards extending the established AGM belief revision theory with respect to iterating revision, preserving conditional beliefs, and handling sets of propositions as new information. In particular, novel postulates like independence and evidence retainment have been brought forth as new standards for revising epistemic states by (sets of) propositional information. In this paper, we propose a constructive approach for revising epistemic states by sets of (propositional and conditional) beliefs that combines ideas from nonmonotonic reasoning with conditional belief revision. We also propose a novel principle called enforcement that covers both independence and evidence retainment, and we show our revision operator to comply with major postulates from the literature. Moreover, we point out the relevance of our approach for default reasoning.
منابع مشابه
TITLE Belief Revision by Sets of Sentences: A General Framework for Belief Revision AUTHOR
The aim of this paper is to extend the system of belief revision developed by Alchourr on, G ardenfors and Makinson (AGM) to a more general framework. This extension not only enables a treatment of revision by single sentences but also by any sets of sentences, especially by in nite sets. The extended revision and contraction operators will be called general ones, respectively. A group of post...
متن کاملParallel belief revision: Revising by sets of formulas
The area of belief revision studies how a rational agent may incorporate new information about a domain into its belief corpus. An agent is characterized by a belief stateK, and receives a new item of information α which is to be included among its set of beliefs. Revision then is a function from a belief state and a formula to a new belief state. We propose here a more general framework for be...
متن کاملType-theoretical Dynamics Exploring Belief Revision in a constructive framework
In the present paper a dynamics for type theory is introduced. The formalization provides epistemic explanations for the basic notions of belief state and belief set by referring to assertion conditions for type-theoretical judgements; it interprets expectations in terms of default assumptions for such a structure and it adapts the usual revision operations and the analogous of the Ramsey test....
متن کاملCognitive Style and Auditor's judgment: Does Cognitive Style mitigate the Impact of recency bias on the auditors’ belief revision process?
Abstract: The purpose of the present study is two-dimensional. First, provide more evidence of the effects of information order on auditors' beliefs, and secondly, examine whether auditors vary their beliefs in different cognitive styles. These goals were achieved through the use of experienced professional auditors. To determine the effects of information sequence, Hogarth and Einhorn’s belie...
متن کاملConsiderations on a Similarity-Based Approach to Beleif Change
A foundational approach to modell ing belief contraction and revision is presented, based on a notion of similarity between belief sets. In contracting from a belief set, the result is the belief set(s) most similar to the original in which is not believed; similar considerations apply to belief revision. The modell ing of belief change generalises the Grove modell ing based on a system of sphe...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011